Differences in perfusion CT parameter values with commercial software upgrades: a preliminary report about algorithm consistency and stability

Author:

Mazzei Maria Antonietta1,Squitieri Nevada Cioffi1,Sani Eleonora2,Guerrini Susanna1,Imbriaco Giusi1,Di Lucia Duccio3,Guasti Andrea4,Mazzei Francesco Giuseppe3,Volterrani Luca1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, Section of Radiological Sciences, University of Siena, Siena

2. Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Department of Physics, Florence

3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena

4. Department of Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy

Abstract

Background Computed tomographic perfusion (CTp) imaging is a promising technique that allows functional imaging, as an adjunct to a morphologic CT examination, that can be used as an aid to carefully evaluate the response to therapy in oncologic patients. Considering this statement, it could be desirable that the measurements obtained with the CT perfusion software, and their upgrades, are consistent and reproducible. Purpose To determine how commercial software upgrades impact on algorithm consistency and stability among the three version upgrades of the same platform in a preliminary study. Material and Methods Blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), mean transit time (MTT), and permeability surface area product (PS) were calculated with repeated measurements ( n = 1119) while truncating the time density curve at different time values in six CT perfusion studies using CT perfusion software version 4D (CT Perfusion 4D), then repeated with the previous version (CT Perfusion 3.0 and CT Perfusion 4.0), using a fixed ROI both for arterial input and target lesion. The software upgrades were compared in pairs by applying a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to all the parameters measured. Stability and reliability of the three versions were verified through the variation of the truncated parameters. Results The three software versions provided different parent distributions for approximately 80% of the 72 parameters measured. A complete agreement was found only for one patient in version 3.0 vs. 4.0 and 3.0 vs. 4D. Perfusion 4.0 vs. 4D: a complete agreement was found only in two cases. Parameters obtained with Perfusion 4D always showed the lowest standard deviation in all temporal intervals and also for all individual parameters. Conclusion The three versions of the same platform tested yield different perfusion measurements. Thus, our preliminary results show that Perfusion 4D version uses a stable deconvolution algorithm to provide more reliable measurements.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3