Author:
Bergqvist L.,Brismar J.,Cederquist E.,Darte L.,Naversten Y.,Palmer J.
Abstract
The bone-imaging agents MDP, DPD and HDP were compared radiochemically (only minor differences were found) in 12 patients with prostatic and 12 patients with breast carcinoma. Each patient received both MDP and either DPD or HDP. The scintigraphic examinations were compared visually and quantitatively. The uptake ratio normal bone/soft tissue was higher for DPD and HDP than for MDP. The ratio pathologic bone/normal bone was highest for MDP, particularly for prostatic carcinoma. The differences in this ratio for breast carcinoma were in general non-significant. The observed differences were minor and of little practical importance.
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference10 articles.
1. Quality control of 99mTc-radiopharmaceuticals
2. Lindgren B. W.: Statistical theory. Third edition, p. 353. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York 1976.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献