The Influence of Race on Detected and Undetected Sexual Offense Histories: A Comparison of White and Black Men Committed as Sexually Violent Persons

Author:

Kelley Sharon M.1ORCID,Kahn Rachel E.1,Zaw Gangaw2

Affiliation:

1. Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, Madison, WI, USA

2. Department of State Hospitals-Forensic Services Division, Sacramento, CA, USA

Abstract

Understanding the difference between the proportion of sexual offenses that are officially detected versus the total number of sexual crimes that occur has been of interest to decision makers for some time. Previous studies have not considered possible racial differences. More aggressive responses by police and the criminal justice system as well as cultural differences in victim type/reporting rates may result in differences between detection rates of Black versus White men. In the current study ( N = 190), we examined the difference between Black ( n = 51) and White ( n = 139) men committed to a forensic hospital as a Sexually Violent Person on factors that could impact the detected rate. Overall, we found that White men had significantly more total victims, undetected victims, undetected and detected child victims, total male victims, undetected male victims, undetected acquaintance victims, and total (detected and undetected) acquaintance victims than Black men. Black men had significantly more detected adult victims, but this difference did not remain when accounting for undetected victims. We explore reasons for these differences as well as provide recommendations for practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference67 articles.

1. Self-Reported Sex Crimes of Nonincarcerated Paraphiliacs

2. Comparing Indian and White men charged or convicted of sexual offences on the Static-99R and STABLE-2007*

3. Predictive accuracy of Static-99R across different racial/ethnic groups: A meta-analysis.

4. American Civil Liberties Union and The Sentencing Project. (2022, July 14). Racial disparities in sentencing in the United States. In 107th session of the UN committee on the elimination of racial discrimination. https://www.sentencingproject.org/app/uploads/2022/10/07-14-2022_CERD-Shadow-Report-Draft_with-endnotes.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3