Affiliation:
1. University of Southampton, UK
Abstract
This commentary provides a summary of Shawn Bodden's intervention, before raising three questions prompted by the article. What is the relationship between a more ordinary critical geography and interpretivism? How is ‘ordinariness’ being used by geographers as a category of geographical analysis? And what might a more ordinary critical geography resemble in practice?
Reference15 articles.
1. Barnett C (2013) Theory as political technology. Antipode. Available at: https://antipodeonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/book-review_barnett-on-amin-and-thrift.pdf (accessed 26 March 2024).
2. Geography and ethics III
3. Must we mean what we do? – Review Symposium on Leys’s The Ascent of Affect
4. Working through our differences: Limits of ontology in the ordinary lives of critical geographical theory