Affiliation:
1. Kansas State University
2. University of Northern Iowa
Abstract
Executive Summary We argue that the nature of myth is such that it may be involved in any personally-significant or group-significant attempt to change behavior or attitudes. Second, in one sense at least, vision has a force to it that requires further exploration; one explanation for such force is that myth may be involved as a rhetorical resource or as a cultural imperative in effective vision. Third, we argue that considering myth and vision as an amalgam enhances our understanding. In short, myth and vision are described as symbiotic, co-activated, co-authorizing constructs.
Reference44 articles.
1. Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness
2. Boal, K.B. & Bryson, J.M. (1988). Charismatic leadership: A phenomenological and structural approach. In J. G. Hunt, et al. (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 11-28). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
3. Myths in a rhetorical context
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献