Stakeholders’ perspectives on safety-related human–robot collaborative scenarios

Author:

Berx Nicole12,Brescia Anita3,Aqamarina Rhea3,Curcio Elio Matteo3,Pintelon Liliane1,Carbone Giuseppe3

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Industrial Management/Traffic and Infrastructure, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

2. Core Lab ROB, Flanders Make@KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium

3. Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy

Abstract

Safety plays a key role when implementing collaborative robots (cobots) in human-shared workspace scenarios. Nevertheless, the significance and understanding of safety-related aspects may significantly vary with different stakeholders’ perspectives. In particular, there is often a misconception that cobots are inherently safe with the result of significantly underestimating the need of adopting adequate safety measures and features for the deployment of collaborative robots in industrial and non-industrial frames. Accordingly, this article develops an in-depth analysis of the stakeholders and their stakes in human–robot collaboration in the manufacturing industry with particular attention to the safety aspects. The proposed approach consists of a field study, with an online questionnaire and structured interviews, directed at the main stakeholders. The field study results are presented and compared with insights from two recent explorative studies. Finally, careful analysis and discussion is provided. This research focuses on three topics: (i) the specific phases in the collaborative robot application cycle, (ii) the stakeholders that are involved in each phase, and (iii) the stakes that affect the stakeholders in general, and specifically the role of safety within these stakes. The findings show that awareness of safety issues is still jeopardized between stakeholders. In addition, key stakeholders still significantly underestimate safety-related issues when implementing cobots in new production lines. This implies the need for objective assessment tools that can systematically address and assess all safety-related aspects. This study provides industry practitioners with a broader view of how different stakeholders regard safety-related aspects in the cobot life cycle. This will enable more informed decision-making when implementing cobot solutions and potentially avoid unconsidered safety risks later on. This article also adds to the scant research on the role of each stakeholder in human–robot collaboration.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Computer Science Applications,Software

Reference72 articles.

1. McKinsey & Company. Industrial robotics: Insights into the sector’s future growth dynamics. https://www.mckinsey.com/∼/media/mckinsey/industries/advanced%20electronics/our%20insights/growth%20dynamics%20in%20industrial%20robotics/industrial-robotics-insights-into-the-sectors-future-growth-dynamics.ashx (2009, accessed 13 July 2023).

2. ISO 12100:2010. Safety of machinery—general principles for design—risk assessment and risk reduction. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2010.

3. IEC 62061:2010. Safety of machinery—functional safety of safety-related electrical, electronic and programmable electronic control systems. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2005.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3