Comprehensive consideration of uncertainty in simulation use

Author:

Pace Dale K1

Affiliation:

1. Consultant, USA

Abstract

Drawing appropriate conclusions from simulation results requires a correct understanding of the accuracy and context of those results. Simulation communities often assess simulation results without considering fully uncertainties that might impact the accuracy and context of those results. This creates potential for inappropriate conclusions from simulation results. Much useful work has been done in uncertainty quantification, but most of those efforts have addressed uncertainty in particular parameters and areas. Unfortunately they have not addressed all areas of potential uncertainty that might impact simulation results. A paradigm exists that facilitates consideration of all potential sources of simulation uncertainty. This paper examines simulation uncertainties using that paradigm and indicates potential magnitude of uncertainties for simulation results in various areas. A comprehensive approach to simulation uncertainty not only reduces the likelihood of drawing inappropriate conclusions from simulation results, but it also provides information that can help determine where it is most useful to invest verification and validation resources in efforts to reduce uncertainty in simulation results (i.e., to improve the accuracy of simulation results). Comprehensive assessment of simulation uncertainty may have drawbacks. When addressed comprehensively, simulation uncertainty tends to be larger than desired, and those announcing such run the risk of being bearers of bad news. Realistic appreciation for the uncertainty associated with simulation results can also decrease the importance of those simulation results in decision processes. On the positive side, such realistic and comprehensive appreciation for simulation uncertainty provides a solid factual and logical basis for how to proceed, whether by improving simulation capabilities or by developing alternative approaches to support decision processes. A perspective from comprehensive consideration of simulation uncertainty helps to ensure a proper context for simulation results.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Engineering (miscellaneous),Modeling and Simulation

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. System of systems uncertainty quantification using machine learning techniques with smart grid application;Systems Engineering;2020-10-13

2. Framework for Modeling and Simulation;Theory of Modeling and Simulation;2019

3. Concept development for comprehensive operations support with modeling and simulation;The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology;2018-11-20

4. Definition and Implementation of a Method for Uncertainty Aggregation in Component-Based System Simulation Models;Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification;2017-02-06

5. Understanding and taxonomy of uncertainty in modeling, simulation, and risk profiling for border control automation;The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology;2016-07-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3