No Space for Reddit Spacing: Mapping the Reflexive Relationship Between Groups on 4chan and Reddit

Author:

Hagen Sal1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

4chan and Reddit have often been lumped together as similar home turfs for geeky, masculine-coded, problematic communities thriving under laissez-faire governance. However, stressing these similarities may overlook not only how the platforms have drifted apart in political-economic terms but also how their similarity encourages assertions of difference between its users. In dialogue with theories on ritual opposition and platform imaginaries, I interrogate this dialectic by tracing the relationship between groups on 4chan and Reddit. How has this relationship developed over time and between subgroups? What do the fractured, fluctuating cross-site associations teach us about the collectivity of both sites? By quantitatively mapping cross-mentions in large archives of Reddit, 4chan/b/, and 4chan/pol/, I identify a lopsided rivalry: 4channers consistently employed antagonistic phrases and stereotypes of Reddit, but 4chan’s relevance throughout Reddit is waning. I moreover find that a platform imaginary of 4chan as neutral, diverse, and unfiltered contradicts with the incessant discursive hostility of its users. The text thereby demonstrates how the collectivization of online subcultures is shaped by reflexive cross-site relations that feature a complex interplay between discursive boundary work, contrasting platform vernaculars, and political resentment.

Funder

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Communication,Cultural Studies

Reference111 articles.

1. 4chan. (2015). Moot’s final 4chan Q&A. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYUKJBZuUig

2. Allen J. (2014). How imageboard culture shaped Gamergate. Boing Boing. https://boingboing.net/2014/12/31/how-imageboard-culture-shaped.html

3. Auerbach D. (2011). Anonymity as culture: Treatise. Triple Canopy, p. 15. https://www.canopycanopycanopy.com/contents/anonymity_as_culture__treatise

4. Baumgartner J., Zannettou S., Keegan B., Squire M., Blackburn J. (2020). The Pushshift Reddit Dataset. ArXiv:2001.08435. http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08435

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3