Embodied Political Influencers: How U.S. Anti-Abortion Actors Co-Opt Narratives of Marginalization

Author:

Martin Zelly1ORCID,Beacken Gabrielle D.1,Trauthig Inga K.1,Woolley Samuel C.1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Texas at Austin, USA

Abstract

U.S. anti-abortion activists use social media to advocate for their cause. While influencer scholarship has proliferated within media studies, the advent of political influencers remains understudied, despite their ability to influence public opinion. Through 16 interviews with anti-abortion political influencers combined with digital observation, we examine the emergent tactics of “progressive” anti-abortion influencers. We find that these influencers co-opt marginalized communities’ ideological frameworks and experiences of discrimination in an effort to influence public opinion on abortion. We build upon the concept of identity propaganda from Reddi, Kuo, and Kreiss, but crucially reveal the ways in which these influencers mobilize their own experiences of oppression as members of marginalized communities themselves. Thus, we put forth the theoretical concept of embodied political influencers to articulate these influencers’ aim to change political opinion through identifying as members of marginalized groups, calling on their own historical—and at times contemporary—experiences of subjugation to propagate embodied propaganda.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference78 articles.

1. Abidin C. (2015). Communicative intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 8, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7264/N3MW2FFG

2. Abidin C., Ots M. (2016). Influencers tell all? Unravelling authenticity and credibility in a brand scandal. In Edström M., Kenyon A. T., Svensson E.M. (Eds.), Blurring the lines: Market-driven and democracy-driven freedom of expression (pp. 153–161). Nordicom. http://www.nordicom.gu.se/en/publikationer/blurring-lines

3. Buymylife.com: Cyber-femininities and commercial intimacy in blogshops

4. Abrams Z. (2023). Abortion bans cause outsized harm for people of color. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/06/abortion-bans-harm-people-of-color

5. Astor M. (2021, September 9). Here’s what the Texas abortion law says. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/abortion-law-texas.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3