Affiliation:
1. University of Washington, USA
2. Stanford University, USA
Abstract
The 2020 US election was accompanied by an effort to spread a false meta-narrative of widespread voter fraud. This meta-narrative took hold among a substantial portion of the US population, undermining trust in election procedures and results, and eventually motivating the events of 6 January 2021. We examine this effort as a domestic and participatory disinformation campaign in which a variety of influencers—including hyperpartisan media and political operatives—worked alongside ordinary people to produce and amplify misleading claims, often unwittingly. To better understand the nature of participatory disinformation, we examine three cases of misleading claims of voter fraud, applying an interpretive, mixed method approach to the analysis of social media data. Contrary to a prevailing view of such campaigns as coordinated and/or elite-driven efforts, this work reveals a more hybrid form, demonstrating both top-down and bottom-up dynamics that are more akin to cultivation and improvisation.
Funder
Craig Newmark Philanthropies
John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
Division of Information and Intelligent Systems
Omidyar Network
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Communication,Cultural Studies
Reference38 articles.
1. The Effects of Participatory Propaganda: From Socialization to Internalization of Conflicts
2. “Donald Trump Is My President!”: The Internet Research Agency Propaganda Machine
3. Center for an Informed Public, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Graphika, & Stanford Internet Observatory. (2021). The long fuse: Misinformation and the 2020 election. Stanford Digital Repository: Election Integrity Partnership. V1.3.0. https://purl.stanford.edu/tr171zs0069
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献