Animal models for cystic fibrosis: A systematic search and mapping review of the literature – Part 1: genetic models

Author:

Leenaars Cathalijn HC123ORCID,De Vries Rob BM1,Heming Anna1,Visser Damian1,Holthaus David1,Reijmer Joey1,Elzinga Janneke1,Kempkes Rosalie WM1ORCID,Punt Carine4,Beumer Wouter4,Meijboom Franck LB2,Ritskes-Hoitinga Merel1

Affiliation:

1. SYRCLE, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

2. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animals in Science and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

3. Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

4. ProQR Therapeutics NV, Leiden, The Netherlands

Abstract

Animal models for cystic fibrosis (CF) have enhanced our understanding of the pathology and contributed to the development of new treatments. In the field of CF, many animal models have been developed and described. To our knowledge, thus far, none of the reviews of CF animal models has used a systematic methodology. A systematic approach to creating model overviews can lead to an objective, evidence-based choice of an animal model for new research questions. We searched Pubmed and Embase for the currently available animal models for CF. Two independent reviewers screened the results. We included all primary studies describing an animal model for CF. After duplicate removal, 12,304 publications were left. Because of the large number of models, in the current paper, only the genetic models are presented. A total of 636 publications were identified describing genetic animal models for CF in mice, pigs, ferrets, rats and zebrafish. Most of these models have an altered Cftr gene. An overview of basic model characteristics and outcome measures for these genetic models is provided, together with advice on using these data. As far as the authors are aware, this is one of the largest systematic mapping reviews on genetic animal models for CF. It can aid in selecting a suitable model and outcome measures. In general, the reporting quality of the included publications was poor. Further systematic reviews are warranted to determine the quality and translational value of these models further.

Funder

Federal state of lower Saxony

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3