Coagulation phenotype of wild-type mice on different genetic backgrounds

Author:

Kopić Alexandra1,Benamara Karima1,Schuster Maria1,Leidenmühler Peter1,Bauer Alexander1,Glantschnig Helmut1,Höllriegl Werner1

Affiliation:

1. Shire, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Genetically engineered mouse models are used to investigate beneficial treatment in haemophilia by comparison with wild-type mice. It has been recognized that wild-type and haemophilic mice of different genetic backgrounds show different bleeding phenotypes. We assessed ex-vivo coagulation parameters in nine wild-type substrains of 129S1/Sv, BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice applying thromboelastography (TEG), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT) and fibrinogen levels. The comprehensive ex-vivo data are discussed in view of results from a tail-tip bleeding assay. Time to first clot formation ( R-time) showed higher within-substrain (CV range: 28–54%) and higher between-substrain (median range: 25.53–42.60 min) variation for BALB/c than for C57BL/6 mice (CV range: 14–31%; median range: 22.45–24.93 min). Median R-time for 129S1/Sv mice was 30.42 min (CV: 33%). No distinct strain differences were observed for maximum amplitude (MA), aPTT, or PT, but males generally showed higher MA and shorter aPTT than females. Males of all substrains had higher fibrinogen levels than females. The heightened in-vivo variability (CV range: 81–171%; median range: 36.00–469.50 mg) in the tail-tip bleeding assay and increased blood loss in wild-type C57BL/6 male mice was not reflected in ex-vivo coagulation parameters. In general, ex-vivo coagulation results appeared consistent within substrains, but showed substrain and sex differences of variable magnitudes. We conclude that alignment of the mouse substrain genetic background to the experimental model is critical to reduce data variability and animal numbers.

Funder

Shire

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3