Health professionals’ experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study

Author:

Bergström Cecilia1ORCID,Ngarina Matilda23,Abeid Muzdalifat4,Kidanto Hussein4,Edvardsson Kristina5ORCID,Holmlund Sophia156ORCID,Small Rhonda57,Sengoma Jean Paul Semasaka1,Ntaganira Joseph8,Lan Pham Thi9,Mogren Ingrid1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Aga Khan University, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania

5. Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

6. Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

7. Department of Women’s and Children’s and Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

8. School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda

9. Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam

Abstract

Background: Obstetric ultrasound is considered important for determining gestational age, identifying single or multiple pregnancies, locating the placenta and fetal anomalies and monitoring fetal growth and pregnancy-related complications in order to improve patient management. Objectives: To explore health professionals’ perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania regarding self-reported skills in performing ultrasound examinations and what could improve access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical setting. Design: Cross-sectional study. Material and Methods: Data was collected between November and December 2017 using a questionnaire based on previous qualitative research results from the CROss Country UltraSound Study (CROCUS Study). Seventeen healthcare facilities in 5 urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were included, with 636 health professionals participating (physicians, n = 307 and midwives/nurses, n = 329). Results: Most health professionals (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses) believed that obstetric ultrasound was decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy. Results indicate proficiency gaps across disciplines: 51% of physicians and 48.8% of midwives/nurses reported no or low-level skills in assessing cervical length. Similarly, deficiencies were observed in evaluating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart (physicians: 51%, midwives/nurses: 61%), aorta, pulmonary artery (physicians: 60.5%, midwives/nurses: 65%) and Doppler assessments (umbilical artery: physicians 60.6%, midwives/nurses 56.1%). Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were significantly more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.26–3.61), better quality of ultrasound machines (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.10–4.69), more training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08–4.17) and more physicians trained in ultrasound (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.30–4.87). Conclusions: Improving the provision of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania requires more and better-quality ultrasound machines, enhanced training for health professionals and an increased number of physicians trained in ultrasound use. To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

Umeå Universitet

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd

Västerbotten Läns Landsting

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3