Determinants of Congruence between the Preferred and Actual Place of Death for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients

Author:

Tang Siew Tzuh1,Mccorkle Ruth2

Affiliation:

1. National Yang-Ming University, School of Nursing, Taipei, Taiwan, and School of Nursing, Yale University

2. School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.

Abstract

A prospective cohort study was conducted to explore the extent of congruence and to identify the determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death of terminally ill cancer patients. A total of 180 terminally ill cancer patients were enrolled (87% response rate) and 127 died during the one-year study period. Nearly 90% of the subjects preferred to die at home. One-third achieved their preference for place of death. The kappa value of congruence (κ=0.11, 95% confidence interval=0.05–0.17) indicated poor to slight agreement between the preferred and actual place death. Important determinants of congruence between the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients included rehospitalisation and receiving hospice home care during the final days of life, perceived ability for family to help achieve preferred place of death, and residence in New Haven County. Conclusions This study directly confirms that the degree of congruence between the preferred and actual place death is unsatisfactory. Clinical interventions and health policies need to be developed to assist terminally ill cancer patients who may not be able to achieve their preference for place of end-of-life care and death.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997; p. 4.

2. Determinants of Place of Death for Terminal Cancer Patients

3. Influence of Patient Preferences and Local Health System Characteristics on the Place of Death

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3