Factors Associated with Palliative Care Knowledge among Internal Medicine House Staff

Author:

Clark Jeanne M.1,Lurie Jon D.2,Claessens Michael T.3,Reed Virginia A.4,Jernstedt G. Christian4,Goodlin Sarah G.5

Affiliation:

1. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

2. Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire

3. Palliative Care Program, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin

4. Dartmouth Medical School, Centre for Educational Outcomes at The C. Everett Koop Institute, and Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire

5. LDS Hospital and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.

Abstract

Purpose To assess knowledge and associated factors in palliative care. Methods Self-administered survey of 88 internal medicine house officers in 1996. Results Twenty-one interns and 36 residents completed the survey for a response rate of 65%. Most house officers reported 1–5 hours of prior formal training in palliative care, 1–5 hours in pain management, and 6–20 hours in ethics. The mean knowledge score was 75% correct (SD=8); pain management scores were lowest (70%). Overall, interns had a significantly lower mean score than residents (70% vs. 77%; p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, only the year of residency was significantly associated with knowledge score; prior formal training in palliative care, pain management, or ethics was not. One third of house officers rated themselves as “not at all” or “only slightly” at ease in caring for a dying patient. These self-ratings were not associated with prior training or knowledge, but were higher in residents compared to interns. Conclusions Palliative care knowledge and ease with dying patients were higher in later years of residency but were not associated with prior formal palliative care training. These data highlight the continued need to evaluate and improve training in palliative care and pain management.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3