Family Members’ Perceptions of Caregiver-Centered Communication with Hospice Interdisciplinary Teams: Relationship to Caregiver Wellbeing

Author:

Washington Karla T.12,Demiris George34,Pitzer Kyle A.12,Tunink Carl5,Benson Jacquelyn J.1,Oliver Debra Parker16

Affiliation:

1. Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

2. The Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA

3. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA

4. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA

5. University of Missouri School of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA

6. Golfarb School of Nursing at Barnes-Jewish College, St. Louis, MO, USA

Abstract

Objective Investigators sought to determine how family caregivers’ psychological and physical wellbeing influenced their perceptions of communication with hospice providers. Methods Researchers conducted a secondary analysis of quantitative data generated during two multisite randomized clinical trials of supportive interventions for hospice family caregivers. Caregivers’ (N = 525) self-reported anxious symptoms, depressive symptoms, physical quality of life, and perceptions of communication with hospice providers were analyzed via a series of linear models that included demographic and contextual controls. Results Caregivers’ anxious symptoms, depressive symptoms, and physical quality of life were largely unrelated to caregivers’ perceptions of their communication with hospice providers when adjusted for demographic and contextual factors. Conclusions Variation in caregivers’ perceptions of their communication with hospice providers was not well explained by caregiver wellbeing. Additional research is needed to understand if and how caregivers’ perceptions of communication with hospice providers are related to factors not included in this secondary analysis. Provider-related variables may be particularly important to consider.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. NHPCO facts and figures: hospice care in America. 2020. https://www.nhpco.org/wp-content/uploads/NHPCO-Facts-Figures-2020-edition.pdf.

2. Hospice and Caregiving

3. Social Work and Palliative Care in Hospice

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3