End-of-Life Care in Acute Care Hospitals in Canada: A Quality Finish?

Author:

Heyland Daren K.1,Groll Dianne2,Rocker Graeme3,Dodek Peter4,Gafni Amiram5,Tranmer Joan6,Pichora Deb2,Lazar Neil7,Kutsogiannis Jim8,Shortt Sam9,Lam Miu10,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario

2. Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario

3. Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia

4. Program in Critical Care Medicine and Center for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia

5. Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario

6. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, and Department of Nursing, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario

7. Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario

8. Department of Critical Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

9. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, and Center for Health Services and Policy Research, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario

10. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, for the Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network (CARENET)*

Abstract

Understanding patients’ and family members’ perspectives on the relative importance of elements of end-of-life (EOL) care and their satisfaction with those elements will help prioritize quality improvement initiatives. We administered a face-to-face questionnaire containing a selection of 28 elements of care to eligible in patients with advanced lung, heart, or liver disease, or metastatic cancer, and available family caregivers (FCGs) in five tertiary care hospitals across Canada. 440 of 569 (78%) eligible patients and 160 of 176 (91%) FCGs participated. No respondent reported complete satisfaction with all elements of care. The average satisfaction score was 4.6 on a 26 point scale. Medical patients reported lower levels of satisfaction than cancer patients. Elements rated as “extremely important” and anything other than “completely satisfied” most frequently by respondents related to discharge planning, availability of home health services, symptom relief, not being a burden, physician trust, and communication. In conclusion, most patients and their family members in our survey were not completely satisfied with EOL care. Improvement initiatives to target key elements identified by patients and FCGs have the potential to improve satisfaction with EOL care across care settings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3