Comprehension and Decision-Making Capacity Questionnaire About Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Study

Author:

Trevizan Fulvio Bergamo1ORCID,Paiva Carlos Eduardo1,Julião Miguel2,de Oliveira Valentino Talita Caroline1,Miwa Michelle Uchida1,Mingardi Mirella1,D’Almeida Preto Daniel1,Ciorlia Juliana Beraldo1,de Angelis Nascimento Maria Salete3,Kovács Maria Júlia4,Dadalto Luciana5,de Oliveira Livia Costa6,da Costa Rosa Karla Santos6,Ribeiro Paiva Bianca Sakamoto1

Affiliation:

1. GPQual - Research Group on Palliative Care and Quality of Life - Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil

2. Community Support Team in Palliative Care - Sintra, Portugal

3. Physician and researcher - Barretos Cancer Hospital, Brazil

4. Department of Psychology of Learning, Development and Personality Psychology in University of São Paulo (USP) - São Paulo, Brazil

5. Newton Paiva University Center - Belo Horizonte, Brazil

6. National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA) - Palliative Care Unit. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Objective(s): To develop a questionnaire that assesses the level of comprehension and decision-making capacity of patients with breast cancer about palliative care and advance care planning. Methods: Questionnaire items were based on the scientific literature. Delphi Consensus, a three-round survey with experts (n  =  14), evaluated the relevance, clarity, and redundancies of the items. A pretest with breast cancer patients (n  =  15) evaluated whether they comprehended each item and identified doubts or discomforts. Results: The initial questionnaire was composed of 38 items. After the Delphi, 18 items were restructured, six were added, and 16 were removed. In the pretest phase, all items with the survey header, guidelines, and Likert model were evaluated. All items accomplished ≥80% cut-off score and were kept as in the original version. The final version of the questionnaire have 28 itens and five domains: determination, responsibility, independence, self-knowledge, and knowledge of reality. Conclusions: This study represents the first step in the development of a questionnaire that may be used in oncology clinical practice. The main findings revealed that Delphi and pretesting increased the quality of the questionnaire, making it compelling to assess breast cancer patients’ comprehension and decision-making capacity about PC and ACP.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3