Affiliation:
1. Humboldt University of Berlin
Abstract
Purpose: The article distinguishes between the three concepts of standardization of the tasks of pedagogical action in modern educational systems: - the traditional concept of standardizing educational goals through curricula, - the literacy concept of psychometric standardization, - and the concept of competence, which can be developed in different ways. Design/Approach/Methods: I examine these concepts and show, - that traditional curriculum orientations suffer from the fact that they have not developed controls over the achievement of objectives, - that literacy concept allows for psychometric measurement, but this is not coordinated with the actual teaching and its goals, - and that competence models only offer further possibilities if their subject-specific requirements are aligned with the educational theoretical and didactic teaching objectives. Findings: Instead of replacing traditional input control with output measurements, it is important to link teaching and educational research in such a way that competence measurements not only measure the levels of demands achieved by learners but also the quality and effectiveness of teaching. Originality/Value: The train of thought overcomes the juxtaposition of philosophy of education and empirical research and shows how both can cooperate theoretically and empirically.
Reference37 articles.
1. Baumert J., Stanat P., Demmrich A. (2001). PISA 2000. Object of investigation, theoretical foundations and implementation of the study [Untersuchungsgegenstand, theoretische Grundlagen und Durchführung der Studie] [in German]. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Hrsg.) (pp. 15–68).
2. Bellmann J. (2006). Educational research and educational policy in the age of “new control” [Bildungsforschung und Bildungspolitik im Zeitalter “Neuer Steuerung”] [in German]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 487–504.
3. Benner D. (2002). The structure of general education in the core curriculum of modern educational systems. A proposal for a framework for PISA based on educational theory [Die Struktur der Allgemeinbildung im Kerncurriculum moderner Bildungssysteme. Ein Vorschlag zur bildungstheoretischen Rahmung von PISA] [in German]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 48, 68–90. (Original work published in 2000)
4. Benner D. (2005). General school education versus general human education? The double danger of mutual damage to both [Schulische Allgemeinbildung versus allgemeine Menschenbildung? Von der doppelten Gefahr einer wechselseitigen Beschädigung beider] [in German]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 563–575.