Education [Bildung]–Literality–Competence: On Competing Tasks of Public Schools and the Need for New Links Between Teaching and Educational Research

Author:

Benner Dietrich1

Affiliation:

1. Humboldt University of Berlin

Abstract

Purpose: The article distinguishes between the three concepts of standardization of the tasks of pedagogical action in modern educational systems: - the traditional concept of standardizing educational goals through curricula, - the literacy concept of psychometric standardization, - and the concept of competence, which can be developed in different ways. Design/Approach/Methods: I examine these concepts and show, - that traditional curriculum orientations suffer from the fact that they have not developed controls over the achievement of objectives, - that literacy concept allows for psychometric measurement, but this is not coordinated with the actual teaching and its goals, - and that competence models only offer further possibilities if their subject-specific requirements are aligned with the educational theoretical and didactic teaching objectives. Findings: Instead of replacing traditional input control with output measurements, it is important to link teaching and educational research in such a way that competence measurements not only measure the levels of demands achieved by learners but also the quality and effectiveness of teaching. Originality/Value: The train of thought overcomes the juxtaposition of philosophy of education and empirical research and shows how both can cooperate theoretically and empirically.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Reference37 articles.

1. Baumert J., Stanat P., Demmrich A. (2001). PISA 2000. Object of investigation, theoretical foundations and implementation of the study [Untersuchungsgegenstand, theoretische Grundlagen und Durchführung der Studie] [in German]. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Hrsg.) (pp. 15–68).

2. Bellmann J. (2006). Educational research and educational policy in the age of “new control” [Bildungsforschung und Bildungspolitik im Zeitalter “Neuer Steuerung”] [in German]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52, 487–504.

3. Benner D. (2002). The structure of general education in the core curriculum of modern educational systems. A proposal for a framework for PISA based on educational theory [Die Struktur der Allgemeinbildung im Kerncurriculum moderner Bildungssysteme. Ein Vorschlag zur bildungstheoretischen Rahmung von PISA] [in German]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 48, 68–90. (Original work published in 2000)

4. Benner D. (2005). General school education versus general human education? The double danger of mutual damage to both [Schulische Allgemeinbildung versus allgemeine Menschenbildung? Von der doppelten Gefahr einer wechselseitigen Beschädigung beider] [in German]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8, 563–575.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3