Affiliation:
1. University of Tulsa
2. Northern Virginia Community College
Abstract
Tenant mobilization in cities across the Americas during the early twentieth century was rooted in local social networks articulated among women in tenement houses, neighborhood residents, ethnic groups, church members, and other forms of informal, nonworkplace association. What distinguishes tenant mobilization during the early twentieth century from earlier examples of urban popular protest is the changing nature of civil society and the state. A shift toward more broad-based democratic governance and a corresponding discourse of citizens’ rights provided renters a powerful new framework from which to articulate their grievances. Collective action on the part of tenants required not only ample resources “from below” but also an opening for such protest afforded “from above.” Critical support for popular mobilization can also be seen, as relatively new political elites broadened their popular base as they battled with more established powers
Subject
Urban Studies,Sociology and Political Science,History
Reference32 articles.
1. Thomas Kessner, The Golden Door: Italian and Jewish Immigrant Mobility in New York City, 1880-1915 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), 33-33.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Rent Strikes: Revolutions at Point Zero;Socialism and Democracy;2022-05-04
2. Bibliography;Anarchists of the Caribbean;2020-04-30
3. Bolivarianismoanarquista;Anarchists of the Caribbean;2020-04-30
4. Anarchists versusYanquisII;Anarchists of the Caribbean;2020-04-30
5. The CaribbeanRedduring the Red Scare;Anarchists of the Caribbean;2020-04-30