Author:
ARLUKE ARNOLD,HAFFERTY FREDERIC
Abstract
Forty-one first-year medical school students were interviewed regarding their expectations of and experience in a physiology laboratory where live, anesthetized dogs were injected with drugs and surgically manipulated before being killed. Before going into lab, there was widespread uneasiness among most students regarding the moral implications of their anticipated use of dogs as experimental tools. However, students described the lab in very positive terms after going through it. The findings suggest that this change in attitude stems from the ability of students to neutralize the moral dirty work of “dog lab.” The authors argue that this is possible because the students learn absolutions that permit denial of responsibility and wrongdoing.
Subject
Urban Studies,Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献