Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Second-Line Treatment Options for Advanced Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Author:

Zhao Luqing1,Zhao Zhiting2,Yan Xiaoqi1,Hu Xiao3,Feng Jifeng1ORCID,Yu Shaorong13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, China

2. Department of Oncology, The Air Force Hospital from Eastern Theater of PLA, Nanjing, China

3. Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Suqian First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University & Suqian First Hospital, Suqian, China

Abstract

Objective As monotherapy such as topotecan has reached a plateau of effectiveness, new second-line treatments based on experience have been used in clinical application. This study compared the efficacy and safety of different second-line treatments for advanced small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods A total of 380 patients with advanced SCLC were screened selectively in the retrospective study. Adverse events and patient responses were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors v1.1. The progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method or Cox survival regression model and compared using the log-rank test. Results In the platinum-resistant group, disease control rate (DCR) and median PFS (mPFS) were prolonged in the combination group versus single-agent group (DCR: 49.24% vs 24.39%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.73 vs 1.90 months, P < .001). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups ( P = .683). The mPFS did not differ among single-agent groups ( P = .380). No significant difference was observed in mPFS of different combination therapy groups ( P = .170). In terms of platinum-based chemotherapy, the DCR and mPFS were prolonged in irinotecan-platinum group versus taxol-platinum group (DCR: 56.14% vs 9.09%, P = .004; mPFS: 3.87 vs 1.93 months, P = .012). Grade 3/4 toxicity was similar between the 2 groups ( P = .614). The mPFS was prolonged in the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy group versus single-agent chemotherapy group ( P = .003). In the platinum-sensitive group, the mPFS did not differ between the combination group and single-agent group ( P = .200). The mPFS did not differ among different single-agent groups ( P = .260) or combination groups ( P = .150). There was no difference in mPFS among different platinum-based chemotherapy groups ( P = .830). Conclusions For patients with platinum-resistant SCLC, combination therapy has shown better efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile than monotherapy. Among combination therapies, irinotecan–platinum has shown better efficacy than taxol–platinum. For patients with platinum-sensitive SCLC, the efficacy of different single-agent or combination therapies was similar.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Guangzhou Life Oasis Public Service Center

“Six Talent Peaks” of Jiangsu Province

Suqian Sci & Tech Program

Social Development Project of Jiangsu Province

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3