Affiliation:
1. Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal,
2. Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, Portugal,
Abstract
This paper analyses the research literature that approaches the contextual interference effect in applied settings. In contrast to the laboratory settings, in which high interference conditions depress acquisition and promote learning evaluated in retention and transfer tests, in applied settings most of the studies (60%) fail to observe positive effects after manipulation of the contextual interference. Some possible explanations for the fact are hypothesized regarding the characteristics of the task, with serial tasks doing best, shor t inter trial intervals rare in applied settings, interference produced by the use of different motor programmes and the possible interference of concurrent feedback in slow tasks in contrast to ballistic skills. It seems that there is a more evident contextual interference effect in an applied setting, when subject learns a serial task with high degree of complexity.
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Education
Reference55 articles.
1. Battig, W.F. (1966) `Facilitation and Interference', in E.A. Bilodeau (ed.) Acquisition of skill, pp. 215—44. New York: Academic Press.
2. Battig, W.F. (1979) `The Flexibility of Human Memory', in L.S. Cermak and F.I.M. Craik (eds) Levels of Processing in Human Memory, pp. 23—44. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Effects of Contextual Interference on Learning Technical Sports Skills
4. Variability Effects on Retention of a Motor Skill in Elementary School Children
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献