Race and Psychological Distress

Author:

Jackson Pamela Braboy1,Williams David R.2,Stein Dan J.3,Herman Allen4,Williams Stacey L.5,Redmond Deidre L.1

Affiliation:

1. Indiana University

2. Harvard University

3. University of Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa

4. National School of Public Health, Medical University of South Africa, Republic of South Africa

5. East Tennessee State University

Abstract

We analyze data from the South African Stress and Health Study, a nationally representative in-person psychiatric epidemiologic survey of 4,351 adults conducted as part of the World Mental Health Survey Initiative between January 2002 and June 2004. All blacks (Africans, Coloreds, and Indians) initially report higher levels of non-specific distress and anger/hostility than whites. Access to socioeconomic resources helps explain differences in non-specific distress between Coloreds and whites and Indians and whites. However, only when social stressors are considered do we find few differences in psychological distress (i.e., non-specific distress and anger/hostility) between Africans and whites. In addition, self-esteem and mastery have independent effects on non-specific distress and anger/hostility, but differences between Coloreds and whites in feelings of anger/hostility are not completely explained by self-esteem and mastery. The findings contribute to the international body of work on social stress theory, challenge underlying assumptions of the minority status perspective, and raise a series of questions regarding mental health disparities among South Africans.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology

Reference74 articles.

1. Testing the Leading Crime Theories: An Alternative Strategy Focusing on Motivational Processes

2. Research in Mental Health: Social Etiology versus Social Consequences

3. Coping, Distress, and Life Events in a Community Sample.

4. Bond Patrick. 2004. “South Africa’s Resurgent Urban Social Movements: The Case of Johannesburg, 1984, 1994, 2004.” Research Report, No. 22, Center for Civil Society, Durban, SA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3