Affiliation:
1. Griffith University, Australia
2. Charles Sturt University, Australia
Abstract
Surveillance infrastructure in China monitors and enables authorities to react to potential risky, miscreant or criminal behaviour. What type of behaviours are perceived to be so, is determined in large part by ideology. Therefore, surveillance infrastructure relies on the machinery of ideology to define the boundaries of its use. In this paper, we outline six key ideological concepts relating to governance in Xi Jinping’s China that have helped to expand the boundaries of surveillance. We identify terms embedded in promotional material of Hikvision and other surveillance technology firms as a springboard for conceptual discussion. The aim is to survey the ideological lexicon of concepts that position surveillance within the Party-state’s broad capacity-building ambitions for governance in Xi’s China. This positioning amplifies the political responsibility of state, social and market actors to work together to broaden surveillance activities for ‘society-building’ purposes, and ultimately for the realisation of Xi Jinping’s goal of National Rejuvenation.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Communication,Cultural Studies
Reference46 articles.
1. Amoeba. (2015, May 14). Several opinions on strengthening the construction of public security video surveillance [关于加强公共安全视频监控建设的若干意见]. https://archive.ph/wip/HAQUw
2. Smart Governance, Smarter Surveillance
3. Legal Reform and Administrative Detention Powers in China
4. Blanchette J. (2022). The edge of an abyss: Xi Jinping’s overall national security outlook. China Leadership Monitor, Fall(73). https://www.prcleader.org/blanchette-september-2022
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献