Investigating deception and the impacts on online game players’ choice in China

Author:

Zhao Mujie1ORCID,Thadani Dimple R1

Affiliation:

1. University of Nottingham Ningbo China, China

Abstract

This article aims to present and analyse the relationship between online game companies and players under four types of deceptions in Chinese game market: mechanism imitation, direct rip off, top-up enticement and negative marketing. The main purpose of this article was to understand how deception affects players’ decision and which type of player is ‘sensitive’ when deception happened. There are 356 valid survey results about attitude to deception collected from players on social network. MGPM* model is used as the data analysis method. Analysis revealed that top-up enticement reduces players’ motivation at highest extent. Players motivated by ‘derivative motivation’ are sensitive and more tend to quit game than those motivated by ‘general motivation’. This research indicates if game company figured out player group structure, when facing survival problem, it can adjust operation strategy by adding deceptions with innocuous effect to players’ motivation to cut operational cost. Meanwhile, the research supplied supporting evidence saying leading companies in game industry should adjust its strategy, changing cognition to growth, reducing deception separation among players and operating from the industrial health perspective.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Communication,Cultural Studies

Reference41 articles.

1. Ballard T., Yeo G., Loft S., Vancouver J. B., Neal A. (2016) An integrative formal model of motivation and decision making: The MGPM. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 235–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000198

2. Bilibili Column. (2020). 原神碰瓷式出现是为了什么,以及谈谈米哈游抄袭发展史. [What is the purpose for the existence of racketeer by Genshin, a brief discussion about the history of plagiarism in Mihoyo]. https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv8260180?from=search

3. Busemeyer J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(3), 538–564. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.538

4. Busemeyer J. R., Townsend J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100(3), 432–459. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.100.3.432

5. Cao S., Xu X. (2020). 竞争、情感与社交:《阴阳师》手游的氪金机制与玩家氪金动机研究 [Competition, emotion, and socialization: A study of top up mechanism and player’s top up motivation in mobile game Onmyoji]. 新闻记者/ Journalism Review. https://doi.org/10.16057/j.cnki.31-1171/g2.2020.07.003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3