Expert Humans or Expert Organizations?

Author:

Mueller Frank1,Dyerson Romano1

Affiliation:

1. School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK

Abstract

Technological change can help to enhance an organization's knowledge base by facilitating communication and information flows. Changing communication and information flows, however, also creates appropriation opportunities for organizational sub-groups. Drawing empirical cases from the ESRC/DTI `New Technologies and the Firm' initiative, we put forward a theoretical framework for the analysis of potential appropriation problems and mechanisms for addressing them. If these mechanisms succeed, organizations can be seen as `expert'; i.e. knowledge flows are under the organization's control. If not, organizations may well employ `expert humans' but are unlikely to fully benefit from their knowledge. We suggest that expert organizations should prioritize the continuity of their knowledge base. Such a strategy not only carefully controls for the flow of personnel, but also avoids undue dependence on external knowledge suppliers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Cited by 52 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3