Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks

Author:

Üsdiken Behlül1,Pasadeos Yorgo2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Management, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

2. College of Communication, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, U.S.A.

Abstract

Over the last decade, the field of organization studies has been characterized by a proliferation of divergent perspectives. Using bibliometric techniques, this paper examines the extent to which this state of differentiation may be associ ated with regional differences in scholarly orientation, specifically, between North America and Europe. The study is based on citation and co-citation analyses of articles published by North American authors in Administrative Science Quarterly and by European authors in Organization Studies in the three-year period from 1990 to 1992. Results do show that there is divergence in the perspectives that are currently dominant in Europe and North America, and, to some degree between Britain and elsewhere in Europe. The discussion section elaborates on the nature of the differences in orientation and speculates on factors that may have fostered and helped to maintain this diver gence.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management

Reference70 articles.

1. Ackroyd, Stephen 1992 'Paradigms lost, paradise regained' in Rethinking organization. M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds.), 102-119. London : Sage.

2. Paradigm Warriors: Donaldson versus the Critics of Organization Theory

3. Aldrich, Howard 1992 'Incommensurable paradigms? Vital signs from three perspectives' in Rethinking organization. M. Reed and M. Hughes (eds.), 17-45. London: Sage.

4. Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth

5. Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory

Cited by 188 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3