Perspectives of Singaporean patients and caregivers towards quality of life or quantity of life with disease-modifying treatment in the end-of-life setting

Author:

Sng David1,Lee Liang Qi1,Tay Keson2,Lee Rachel Jiayu2,Puvanendran Rukshini3,Radha Krishna Lalit Kumar4

Affiliation:

1. Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University Hospital, Singapore

3. Family Medicine Service, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

4. Division of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Background: Healthcare providers often struggle to balance the sometimes competing considerations of maximizing quality of life (QoL) and quantity of life with disease-modifying treatment (DMT). These decisions require in-depth dialog between all parties in order to understand the concerns and perspectives of the patient and caregiver in this period. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to explore Singaporean patients’ and caregivers’ attitudes towards QoL and DMT, and to examine the reasons behind their beliefs. Methods: Participants were given a video vignette of a family discussing how best to care for their mother who is recently diagnosed with cancer and were interviewed regarding their thoughts on QoL and DMT for a 70-year-old patient with stage IV metastatic cancer. Subjects/Setting: A total of 21 patients and caregivers were recruited from a tertiary oncology centre. Results: Both patients and caregivers show little support for pursuing QoL, despite the likely compromise to the patients’ QoL. These participants believed that not pursuing DMT was tantamount to giving up and accepting death. Whilst patients did accept that in some circumstances a QoL approach would be acceptable, caregivers remained adamant upon a DMT approach. The perspectives of caregivers reflected the influence of the Confucian-inspired practice of filial piety. Conclusion: Local sociocultural beliefs and values continue to play a significant consideration in end-of-life decision-making. However, compliance with these beliefs have evolved, with greater consideration given to clinical and QoL factors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3