Assessing the Criterion Validity of Curriculum-Based Measures for Children with Intellectual Disabilities

Author:

Rodgers Derek B.1ORCID,King Seth A.1,Martin Guy2,Lemons Christopher J.3

Affiliation:

1. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA

2. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

3. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Abstract

Curriculum-based measures (CBMs), which allow educators to monitor progress over time and make instructional decisions based on student performance, represent a fixture of general approaches to reading and data-based instructional frameworks. However, evidence supporting the use of CBM for students with intellectual disabilities is limited. This study evaluated the criterion validity of a reading CBM battery. Multiple CBM and standardized criterion measures were administered to elementary-age children ( N = 56) with intellectual disabilities. Inferential analyses identified numerous domain-specific correlations between CBM and criterion measures; however, no single CBM emerged as a more effective predictor of reading performance. Findings provide qualified support for the use of CBM with children who have intellectual disabilities.

Funder

Institute of Education Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Education

Reference37 articles.

1. Allor J. H., Mathes P. G., Roberts J. K., Jones F. G., Champlin T. M. (2010). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(1), 3–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880147

2. The effects of student and text characteristics on the oral reading fluency of middle-grade students.

3. Strengths and weaknesses in reading skills of youth with intellectual disabilities

4. Interrelations of Growth in Letter Naming and Sound Fluency in Kindergarten and Implications for Subsequent Reading Fluency

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3