Clinical Reasoning for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Practitioners: The Mindful Formulation

Author:

Havighurst Sophie S.1,Downey Laurel2

Affiliation:

1. University of Melbourne, Australia,

2. James Cook University, Australia

Abstract

This article outlines a systematic approach to the formulation of clinical problems for practitioners working with children and their families. Whilst assessments in child and adolescent mental health often use a range of theoretical and practical approaches for data collection, there are relatively few resources to assist the clinician in integrating this information to develop a formulation that leads to a well considered intervention plan. The formulation approach presented here was designed to assist in training child and adolescent clinicians in a method that facilitates the process of understanding complex cases. This is done by examining the patterns of strength and difficulty identified during an assessment and systematically providing an explanation for these using `the Four Ps' — predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, and protective factors — to structure the clinician's thinking. Interventions that address patterns of strength and difficulty for each of the `Four Ps' are recommended when working with complex clients. This formulation approach may take more time than merely summarizing the case, but the benefits are a more comprehensive understanding of the client. This means that problems often associated with working with complex cases can be identified and addressed, reducing the risk of drop out, poor engagement or treatment failure.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference15 articles.

1. Broder, E.A. & Hood, E. (1983). A guide to the assessment of child and family . In P.D. Steinhauer, & Q. Rae-Grant (Eds.), Psychological problems of the child in the family (2nd ed., pp. 25-55). New York: Basic Books.

2. An Interactional Model of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Clinical Case Formulation

3. Inferential heuristics in clinical problem formulation: Selective review of their strengths and weaknesses.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3