On Track or Off Track? Identifying a Typology of Math Course-Taking Sequences in U.S. High Schools

Author:

Han Seong Won1ORCID,Kang Chungseo1,Weis Lois1,Dominguez Rachel1

Affiliation:

1. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

Abstract

The authors examine students’ linear progression histories in mathematics throughout high school years, using the High School Longitudinal Study of 2009. Although scholars have attended to this before, the authors provide a new organizing framework for thousands of heterogenous mathematics course-taking sequences. Using cluster analysis, the authors identify eight distinctive course-taking sequence typologies. Approximately 45 percent of students take a linear sequence of mathematics, whereas others stop taking mathematics altogether, repeat coursework, or regress to lower level courses. Only about 14 percent of students take the expected four-year linear sequence of Algebra 1–Geometry–Algebra II–Advanced Mathematics. Membership into different typologies is related to student characteristics and school settings (e.g., race, socioeconomic status, and high school graduation requirements). The results provide a tool for schools’ self-assessment of mathematics course-taking histories among students, creating intervention opportunities and a foundation for future research on advancing our understanding of stratification in math course-taking patterns, postsecondary access, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference59 articles.

1. Adelman Clifford. 1998. “Women and Men of the Engineering Path: A Model for Analyses of Undergraduate Careers.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

2. The Bird’s Eye View of Community Colleges: A Behavioral Typology of First-Time Students Based on Cluster Analytic Classification

3. Bridgeland John, Bruce Mary. 2011. “2011 National Survey of School Counselors: Counseling at a Crossroads.” New York: College Board Advocacy & Policy Center.

4. Brown J., Dalton B., Laird J., Ifill N. 2018. “Paths through Mathematics and Science: Patterns and Relationships in High School Coursetaking.” NCES 2018-118. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

5. Burkam David T., Lee Valerie E. 2003. “Mathematics, Foreign Language, and Science Coursetaking and the NELS:88 Transcript Data.” Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3