Artificial Intelligence Policymaking: An Agenda for Sociological Research

Author:

Law Tina1ORCID,McCall Leslie2

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

2. The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Sociological research on artificial intelligence (AI) is flourishing: sociologists of inequality are examining new and concerning effects of AI on American society, and computational sociologists are developing novel ways to use AI in research. The authors advocate for a third form of sociological engagement with AI: research on how AI can be publicly governed to advance equity in American society. The authors orient sociologists to the rapidly evolving AI policy landscape by defining AI and by contrasting two leading approaches to AI governance: a safety-based and an equity-based approach. The authors argue that the safety-based approach is the predominant one but is inadequate. They suggest that sociologists can shift AI policymaking to prioritize equity by examining corporate political power in AI policy debates and by organizing research around four sociological questions centered on equity and public engagement. The authors conclude with recommendations for supporting and coordinating policy-oriented research on AI in sociology.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference74 articles.

1. Machine Learning and the Reproduction of Inequality

2. Justice by Means of Democracy

3. Allen Danielle, Hubbard Sarah, Lim Woojin, Stanger Allison, Wagman Shlomit, Zalesne Kinney. 2024. “A Roadmap for Governing AI: Technology Governance and Power Sharing Liberalism.” Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Working Paper. Retrieved February 26, 2024. https://ash.harvard.edu/publications/roadmap-governing-ai-technology-governance-and-power-sharing-liberalism.

4. Large Language Models, Social Demography, and Hegemony: Comparing Authorship in Human and Synthetic Text

5. Amodei Dario. 2023. “Written Testimony of Dario Amodei, Ph.D., Co-founder and CEO, Anthropic.” U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law, Hearing on Oversight of AI: Principles for Regulation, July 25.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3