Affiliation:
1. Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
2. Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
3. University of Arizona Cancer Center and College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Recruiting organizations (i.e., health plans, health systems, or clinical practices) is important for implementation science, yet limited research explores effective strategies for engaging organizations in pragmatic studies. We explore the effort required to meet recruitment targets for a pragmatic implementation trial, characteristics of engaged and non-engaged clinical practices, and reasons health plans and rural clinical practices chose to participate. Methods: We explored recruitment activities and factors associated with organizational enrollment in SMARTER CRC, a randomized pragmatic trial to increase rates of CRC screening in rural populations. We sought to recruit 30 rural primary care practices within participating Medicaid health plans. We tracked recruitment outreach contacts, meeting content, and outcomes using tracking logs. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we analyzed interviews, surveys, and publicly available clinical practice data to identify facilitators of participation. Results: Overall recruitment activities spanned January 2020 to April 2021. Five of the 9 health plans approached agreed to participate (55%). Three of the health plans chose to operate centrally as 1 site based on network structure, resulting in 3 recruited health plan sites. Of the 101 identified practices, 76 met study eligibility criteria; 51% (n = 39) enrolled. Between recruitment and randomization, 1 practice was excluded, 5 withdrew, and 7 practices were collapsed into 3 sites for randomization purposes based on clinical practice structure, leaving 29 randomized sites. Successful recruitment required iterative outreach across time, with a range of 2 to 17 encounters per clinical practice. Facilitators to recruitment included multi-modal outreach, prior relationships, effective messaging, flexibility, and good timing. Conclusion: Recruiting health plans and rural clinical practices was complex and iterative. Leveraging existing relationships and allocating time and resources to engage clinical practices in pragmatic implementation research may facilitate more diverse representation in future trials and generalizability of research findings.
Funder
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute
Reference40 articles.
1. Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect
2. Foutz JA, Samantha A, Garfield R. The Role of Medicaid in Rural America. 2017. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://files.kff.org/attachment/Issue-Brief-The-Role-of-Medicaid-in-Rural-America
3. Cromartie J, Dobis EA, Krumel TP, McGranahan D, Pender J. Rural America at a Glance. 2020. Accessed 2022. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/100089/eib-221.pdf?v=2348.2
4. Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends