The Impact of Primary Care Practice Models on Indicators of Unplanned Health Care Utilization for Ontario Adults Newly Diagnosed With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Sheng Ruixi1ORCID,Tranmer Joan E1,Godfrey Christina1,Rotter Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent chronic disease. Most of the care for this population occurs within the primary care setting; however, the extent to which different primary care practice models influence the outcomes of patients with COPD remains unclear. Objective: The study aimed to compare and analyze the influence of different primary care practice models on indicators of unplanned health care utilization among newly diagnosed COPD patients in Ontario. Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using health administrative database within the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. The cohort included persons who were 35 years and older with physician-diagnosed COPD between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019. Patients were assigned into 3 practice models: team-based, traditional, and no enrolment. The primary outcomes examined was unplanned health care utilization, specifically emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. To account for excessive zero values, the zero inflated negative binomial (ZINB) models were used to analyze the association between different practice models and unplanned health care utilization. Results: Among 57,145 individuals who met the inclusion criteria, 55,994 were included in the regression analysis. Of the included participants, 62.8% of patients were in the traditional group, 30.3% were in the team-based group, and 6.9% were in the no enrolment group. Between 2014 and 2019, 70.7% of the cohort had at least 1 all-cause ED visit without hospitalization. The adjusted ZINB models showed no significant difference in risks of experiencing an unplanned health care utilization between the team-based and traditional groups. However, patients in the no enrolment group had a significantly higher risk of ED visit without hospitalization regardless of cause, ED visit with hospitalization regardless of cause, and 30-day readmissions regardless of cause. Conclusions: Primary care practice models are complex, influenced by remuneration and organizational structures, reinforcing the need for further research to enhance our understanding of primary care reforms. Furthermore, given the growing shortage of primary care providers, patients with COPD and other chronic conditions are particularly vulnerable.

Funder

Mitacs Research Training Award

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care

Reference40 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2019: monitoring health for the sustainable development goals. May 21, 2019. Accessed July 15, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-health-statistics-2019-monitoring-health-for-the-sdgs-sustainable-development-goals

2. Government of Ontario. Preventing and managing chronic disease: Ontario’s framework. May, 2007. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/cdpm/pdf/framework_full.pdf

3. Canadian Institute for Health Informatics. COPD: a focus on high users – infographic. 2017. Accessed July 15, 2023. https://www.cihi.ca/en/copd-a-focus-on-high-users-infographic

4. Health Quality Ontario. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: care in the community for adults. 2018. Accessed July 15, 2023. https://www.hqontario.ca/Portals/0/documents/evidence/quality-standards/qs-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-quality-standard-en.pdf

5. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease: global strategy for diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease. 2018. Accessed July 15, 2023. https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/GOLD-2018-v6.0-FINAL-revised-20-Nov_WMS.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3