Patient Preferences in Choosing a Primary Care Physician

Author:

Mercado Francis1,Mercado Margaret1,Myers Nancy2,Hewit Michael2,Haller Nairmeen Awad1

Affiliation:

1. Akron General Medical Center, Akron, OH

2. Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH

Abstract

Background and Aims: Studies have identified factors important to patients in consideration of a primary care physician (PCP). Few have explored relevant differences in choosing between family medicine (FM) and internal medicine (IM) physicians. The objective of this study was to identify differences in rating of factors perceived to be important to racially diverse FM and IM patients in the selection of a PCP, and to determine patient knowledge of PCP training. Settings, Design, Methods, and Material: This observational study used self-administered questionnaires to obtain information from adult participants at 2 continuity clinics, FM and IM. Participants rated 16 factors on their importance in selecting a PCP. Demographics and information regarding participants’ knowledge of PCP training were collected. Statistical Analyses Used and Results: 857 surveys were completed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Student t test, χ2, and multivariate logistic regression. Sixty-five percent and 32% of participants were Caucasian or African American, respectively. Combined responses from both clinics revealed g ood patient care as the factor ranked highest in importance for selecting a PCP, followed by good communication skills. Forty-eight percent and 35% of FM and IM participants, respectively, did not know whether their PCP was trained in IM or FM. More than 50% of participants were not familiar with the scope of their physicians’ practice. Conclusions: Our results suggest that good patient care and communication are similarly important to all patients, regardless of race. Practices should maintain focus on these qualities, as well as on patient education regarding the relevant differences between FM and IM physicians. Results from this study are consistent with prior research on these issues in more racially homogenous populations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3