Supporting the AEA Mission of Improving Evaluation Practice, Methods, and Use

Author:

Julnes George1,Newcomer Kathryn2

Affiliation:

1. University of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA

2. The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

The growing emphasis on using evidence to inform decisions in public sector policy making has created both opportunities for and demands on the American Evaluation Association (AEA) in pursuing its mission “to improve evaluation practices and methods, increase evaluation use, promote evaluation as a profession, and support the contribution of evaluation to the generation of theory and knowledge about effective human action.” This article explores one approach to addressing these opportunities and demands—establishing a National Academy of Evaluation (NAE)—by describing suggestions and concerns that arose during an extended discussion of the opportunities and challenges of establishing an NAE that took place in the fall of 2014 via EvalTalk and at the 2014 national AEA conference. Initially, we felt some skepticism about the value and viability of an NAE, but subsequent experience with AEA’s Evaluation Policy Task Force (EPTF), with Julnes as an EPTF member and Newcomer as a liaison from AEA’s presidential rotation, made clear to us that the promise of an academy is strong, given the need for more capacity in supplying expert guidance on evaluation to governments, other organizations, and other evaluation stakeholders. Whether AEA should move forward in establishing an NAE, however, requires more than the promise of its contributions. This article seeks to summarize the issues and some consensus conclusions that emerged in earlier discussions so as to promote critical discussions, with insights from diverse perspectives, on the value of establishing some form of a national academy to advance the profession of evaluation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Health(social science),Social Psychology,Business and International Management

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3