“A Lot of It Really Does Come Down to Values”: An Empirical Study of the Values Advanced by Seasoned Evaluators

Author:

Teasdale Rebecca M.1ORCID,McNeilly Jennifer R.2,Ramírez Garzón Maria Isabel3ORCID,Novak Judit4,Greene Jennifer C.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

2. Math Merit Program, Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

3. Center for Learning, Teaching, and Evaluation (CAE + E), Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia

4. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

5. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

Abstract

This study challenges persistent misrepresentations of evaluation as a value-neutral inquiry process by presenting an empirical study that deepens understanding of evaluators’ values and how they “show up” in evaluation practice. Through semistructured interviews and inductive analysis, we examined the values advanced by a sample of eight experienced evaluators. We surfaced and examined 12 values, which we organized into five clusters, that shaped the constitutive elements of the studies these evaluators conducted and guided how the evaluators positioned their work. Our findings provide empirical evidence about the role of values in evaluation practice and can support evaluators in reflecting on their own values and enacting their professional and ethical responsibilities to identify and articulate their values in the context of evaluation practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Health (social science),Social Psychology,Business and International Management

Reference59 articles.

1. American Evaluation Association. (2018). Guiding principles for evaluators. https://www.eval.org/About/Guiding-Principles

2. American Evaluation Association. (n.d.). Values of the American Evaluation Association. https://www.eval.org/About/About-AEA

3. Understanding pharmacists' values: A qualitative study of ideals and dilemmas in UK pharmacy practice

4. Can Social Justice Live in a House of Structural Racism? A Question for the Field of Evaluation

5. Reforms as experiments.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3