Affiliation:
1. Community Evaluation and Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI,
2. Michigan State University
Abstract
A central issue in the use of rapid evaluation and assessment methods (REAM) is achieving a balance between speed and trustworthiness. In this article, the authors review the key differences and common features of this family of methods and present a case example that illustrates how evaluators can use rapid evaluation techniques in their own work. In doing so, the authors hope to (a) introduce readers to a family of techniques with which they may be unfamiliar, (b) highlight their strengths and limitations, and (c) suggest appropriate contexts for use. Ultimately, the authors hope that REAM becomes a valuable addition to evaluators' toolkits.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Health(social science),Social Psychology,Business and International Management
Reference33 articles.
1. Anker, M., Guidotti, R., Orzeszyna, S., Sapirie, S. & Thuriax, M. (1993). Rapid evaluation methods (REM) of health services performance: Methodological observations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 71(1), 15-21.
2. Commercial sex work, drug use, and sexually transmitted infections in St. Petersburg, Russia
Cited by
169 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献