Abstract
In this article, we reflect on our experience applying a framework for evaluating systems change to an evaluation of a statewide West Virginia alliance funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to improve the early persistence of rural, first-generation, and other underrepresented minority science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students in their programs of study. We begin with a description of the project and then discuss the two pillars around which we have built our evaluation of this project. Next, we present the challenge we confronted (despite the utility of our two pillars) in identifying and analyzing systems change, as well as the literature we consulted as we considered how to address this difficulty. Finally, we describe the framework we applied and examine how it helped us and where we still faced quandaries. Ultimately, this reflection serves two key purposes: (1) to consider a few of the challenges of measuring changes in systems, and (2) to discuss our experience applying one framework to address these issues.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Health (social science),Social Psychology,Business and International Management
Reference67 articles.
1. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
2. Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness
3. Bernoff J., Li C. (2010). Ladder of online participation. Participation models: Citizens, youth, online. Nonformality. https://www.nonformality.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Participation-Models-20110703.pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献