Abstract
In the wake of the current cycle of Islamic resurgence, which began at the time of the June 1967 Arab-Israeli war, the question of rule has been at the center of clerical discourse. This article analyzes this question in the debates of the Egyptian and Iranian ` ulama'. While they agree upon the perception of Islam as both religion and state and upon the need to base public law upon the shari`a (the holy law of Islam), they differ on the role of secular rulers, the relevance of jihad, identifying apostates, calling for rebellion, authorizing the ` ulama' to rule society, and endowing Islamic states with extraordinary powers. The debate will continue to focus on these issues in the future, as Islamic groups press the case for full implementation of the shari`a in all areas of life, not only in Egypt and Iran but in all Muslim societies.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Reference18 articles.
1. Shaykh `Umar al-Tilimsani , Dhikrayat, la mudhakkarat [Remembrances, not reminders] (Cairo: Dar al-Taba`a wa al-Nashr al Islamiyya, 1985), p. 274;
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献