Affiliation:
1. Program in Latin American Studies (PLAS) at Princeton University
Abstract
This article questions the widely held view that indigenous movements in Latin America during the last decades of the twentieth century were caused by globalization. The author reviews several bodies of literature and concludes that, although globalization may be a fit descriptor for some of the actions and narratives of indigenous movements, it cannot be understood as a causal determinant. Many indigenous movements emerged long before the neoliberal current started, others coincide with it, and yet others lag significantly. The author proposes an alternative framework that gives primary significance to state–society relations. Contrary to the idea that national states may have lost prominence in the age of globalization I contend the opposite, suggesting also that indigenous movements have emerged where there are (1) challenges to preexisting corporate identities, (2) transcommunity networks to provide the resources for mobilization, and (3) associational spaces to facilitate collective expression.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Emotions and resistance in diaspora: the case of Australia’s Kurds from Turkey;Ethnic and Racial Studies;2023-05-04
2. References;Scales of Resistance;2023-05
3. Notes;Scales of Resistance;2023-05
4. Coda: The Subterranean Life of Seeds;Scales of Resistance;2023-05
5. Translocal Geographies of Indigeneity;Scales of Resistance;2023-05