Author:
Maguire Edward R.,King William R.
Abstract
Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidencedoes a terrific job of discussing the limited research on trends in the policing industry, but what it does not include is perhaps as informative. Large gaps in the body of research limit our ability to make definitive inferences about how the policing industry is changing. These gaps result in part from a lack of systematic, standardized, longitudinal data collection and analysis on the nature and outputs of police organizations in the United States. As a result, we know little about basic descriptive features of policing and how these features are changing over time. Lacking the ability to track even the most basic descriptive trends, the police research industry is at even more of a loss in developing careful empirical explanations of these trends. This article discusses some of these trends, summarizes what we know and what we do not know about them, and provides some recommendations for how the police research industry can do a better job of describing and explaining trends in the police industry.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science
Reference36 articles.
1. The Future of Policing
2. Brinkerhoff, John R. 2002. The Posse Comitatus Act and Homeland Security . Journal of Homeland Security(February). http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/articles/brinkerhoffpossecomitatus.htm/.
3. Third-party policing: A theoretical analysis of an emerging trend
4. Crank, John P. 1990. Patterns of consolidationamong public safety departments, 1987-1988 . Journal of Police Science and Administration 17 (4): 277-288 .
5. SCALE ECONOMIES AND POLICE DEPARTMENT CONSOLIDATION: EVIDENCE FROM LOS ANGELES
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献