Policy Implications of the Diffusion and Control of Medical Technology

Author:

BANTA H. DAVID,BURNS ANNE KESSELMAN,BEHNEY CLYDE J.

Abstract

Medical technology has become a controversial national policy issue, largely because of rapidly rising national health expenditures and their relation to medical technology. These costs are increasingly viewed in relation to benefits or effectiveness. Attempts to control medical technology, to consider benefits in relation to costs, have largely been regulatory, and have failed to ameliorate cost rises. This failure has stimulated consideration of the reimbursement system as a controlling device. The Medicare program already has developed a rather formal process for making reimbursement decisions based on technology assessments. However, fundamental reform of the reimbursement system seems necessary to counter perverse incentives built into payment. Recent proposals to shift to prospective payment is an example of such a change. However, the basically private nature of the health care system and the limited leverage of the Medicare program limits the power of the federal government to make change.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science

Reference60 articles.

1. 1. John Kenneth Galbraith, The New Industrial State (New York: New American Library, 1977), p. 31.

2. 2. U.S., Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Technologies, GPO stock no. 052-003-00593-0 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1978), p. xii.

3. 3. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Health U.S. 1981, DHHS pub. no. (PHS) 82-1232 (Hyattsville, MD: DHHS, 1981), p. 195, Table 60.

4. 4. Stuart Altman and Robert Blendon, eds. Medical Technology: The Culprit behind Health Care Costs (Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Services Research and Bureau of Health Planning, 1979), pp. 27-30.

5. 5. U.S., Congress, OTA, Strategies for Medical Technology Assessment, GPO stock no. 052-003-00887-4 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1982), pp. 91 ff;

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3