Affiliation:
1. District of Columbia Department of Transportation
Abstract
Transportation investments often increase nearby land values. This can choke off development, pushing new growth to cheaper sites remote from these investments. This “leapfrog” development creates a demand for infrastructure extension that starts the process over again. Transportation infrastructure, intended to facilitate development, thus chases it away. Resulting sprawl strains the transportation, fiscal, and environmental systems upon which communities rely. Several jurisdictions around the country utilize a value-capture technique embedded in their property tax to help finance infrastructure and motivate affordable compact development. They reduce the tax rate on assessed building values and increase the tax rate on assessed land values. The resulting compact development should facilitate better transportation and accommodate economic growth with reduced fiscal and environmental costs. This technique’s ability to foster affordable compact development might help bridge the gap between those who advocate growth boundaries and those who fear the impact of growth boundaries on affordable housing.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference10 articles.
1. Benjamin, J. D. & Sirmans, G. S. (1996). Mass transportation, apartment rent and property values. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 12(1), 1-8.
2. DiMasi, J. (1987, December). The effects of site value taxation in an urban area: A general equilibrium computational approach. National Tax Journal, 40, 577-590.
3. Dougherty, J. (1995, November 27). Private developer to build $20 million Va. metro station: Public private partnership is lauded. Passenger Transport, 53(47), 7.
4. Incentive Property Taxation
5. Layton, L. (2001, August 18). Metro sees $3.7 billion shortfall by 2025. The Washington Post, p. B01.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献