The association between conditioned pain modulation and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain: A systematic review

Author:

Mansfield Michael123ORCID,Roviello Gianluca14,Thacker Mick5,Willett Matthew12,Bannister Kirsty6,Smith Toby7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

2. Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

3. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

4. Physiotherapy Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

5. School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

6. Central Modulation of Pain, Wolfson Centre of Age Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

7. Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Abstract

Chronic spinal pain has negative effects on physical and mental well-being. Psychological factors can influence pain tolerance. However, whether these factors influence descending modulatory control mechanisms measured by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in people with chronic spinal pain is unclear. This systematic review investigated the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain. Published and unpublished literature databases were searched from inception to 23rd October 2023 included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed. Studies assessing the association between CPM response and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain were eligible. Data were pooled through meta-analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the AXIS tool and the certainty of evidence measured through GRADE. From 2172 records, seven studies ( n = 598) were eligible. Quality of included studies was moderate. There was very low certainty of evidence that depression ( r = 0.01 [95% CI −0.10 to 0.12], I2 = 0%), and anxiety ( r = −0.20 [95% CI −0.56 to 0.16], I2 = 84%), fear avoidance ( r = −0.10 [95% CI −0.30 to 0.10], I2 = 70%) had no statistical associations with CPM responder status. Higher pain catastrophising was associated with CPM non-responder status (r = −0.19; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.02; n = 545; I2: 76%) based on a very low certainty of evidence measured by GRADE. There is currently limited available evidence demonstrating an association between CPM response and psychological factors for people with chronic pain. Managing an individual’s chronic pain symptoms irrespective of comorbid psychological distress, should continue until evidence offer insights that more targeted interventions are needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3