The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review

Author:

Bhattacharyya Anit12,Hopkinson Lily D3ORCID,Nolet Paul S45,Srbely John3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

3. Department of Human Health & Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

4. Department of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

5. CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background and Objective Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systematic review are to: (1) analyze the literature evaluating the reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements in the assessment of neck and low-back pain, (2) summarize the evidence from these studies, and (3) characterize the limitations of PPT measurement. Databases and Data Treatment Relevant literature from PubMed and the Web of Science electronic databases were screened in a 3-step process according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Relevant studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool, and results of all studies were summarized and tabulated. Results Of 922 citations identified, 11 studies were deemed relevant for critical appraisal, and 8 studies were deemed to have low risk-of bias. Intra-rater reliability, reported in all studies ( n = 637) and inter-rater reliability, reported in 2 studies ( n = 200) were consistently reported to be good to excellent (ICC 0.75–0.99 and ICC 0.81–0.90, respectively). Studies were also found to have significant variation in PPT measurement procedures. Conclusions Though intra- and inter-rater reliability was found to be high in all studies, the variation in PPT measurement protocols could affect validity and absolute reliability. As such, it is recommended that standard guidelines be developed for clinical use.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3