Could negative outcomes of psychotherapies be contributing to the lack of an overall population effect from the Australian Better Access initiative?

Author:

Allison Stephen12ORCID,Looi Jeffrey CL34ORCID,Kisely Steve5ORCID,Bastiampillai Tarun67ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and

2. Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia

3. Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine and Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, ACT, Australia; and

4. Consortium of Australian Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy Research and Analysis, Canberra, ACT, Australia

5. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia

6. Psychiatry, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and

7. Psychiatry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Objective We examine deterioration in psychotherapies, as reported in the recent evaluation of the Australian Medicare Better Access initiative. Conclusion A focus on patients who experience poor clinical outcomes helps programs minimise harm and improve quality of care. The Better Access evaluation found the mental health of 20–40% of patients deteriorated. This may partly explain why population distress and suicide rates were not reduced by the introduction of the Better Access initiative. Deterioration was more likely for milder conditions, and less likely for severe conditions, which also improved the most. Using severity as a criterion for priority setting and resource allocation may minimise patient risk and maximise benefits. Patients with severe conditions may require considerably more sessions than the current average for Better Access psychotherapies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3