Comparing the trends of MBS telepsychiatry and consultant physician telehealth services from 2017 to 2022: A retrospective study

Author:

Woon Luke S-C12ORCID,Allison Stephen34ORCID,Bastiampillai Tarun546ORCID,Kisely Steve578,Maguire Paul15,Pring William591011,Reay Rebecca12,Looi Jeffrey CL15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University Medical School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia

2. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

3. Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia;

4. College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

5. Consortium of Australian-Academic Psychiatrists for Independent Policy and Research Analysis (CAPIPRA), Canberra, ACT, Australia

6. Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

7. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

8. Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhouise University, Halifax, NS, Canada

9. Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

10. Centre for Mental Health Education and Research at Delmont Private Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

11. Private Psychiatrist, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

12. Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University Medical School of Medicine and Psychology

Abstract

Objective The Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) telehealth items were expanded in March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured the use of MBS telepsychiatry items compared to consultant physician telehealth items within the context of these item changes, to understand differences in telepsychiatry and physician telehealth utilisation. Methods Monthly counts of face-to-face and telehealth (videoconferencing and telephone) MBS items for psychiatrists and physicians from January 2017 to December 2022 were compiled from Services Australia MBS Item Reports. Usage levels were compared before and after telehealth item expansion. Usage trends for MBS telepsychiatry and physician telehealth items were compared in time-series plots. Results Telehealth item expansion resulted in a greater rise of telepsychiatry services from 3.8% beforehand to 43.8% of total services subsequently, compared with physician telehealth services (from 0.6% to 20.0%). More physician telehealth services were by telephone compared with telepsychiatry services. Time-series of both telehealth services displayed similar patterns until mid-2022, when physician telehealth services declined as telephone items were restricted. Telepsychiatry services consistently comprised a greater proportion of total services than physician telehealth services. Conclusions MBS psychiatrist services showed a more substantial and persistent shift to telehealth than physician services, suggesting a greater preference and use of telepsychiatry.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference32 articles.

1. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future

2. Department of Health. Australians embrace telehealth to save lives during COVID-19; 2020.

3. Department of Health. COVID-19 temporary MBS telehealth services, https://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/0C514FB8C9FBBEC7CA25852E00223AFE/$File/Factsheet-COVID-19-Spec-27.04.21.pdf (2021, accessed 28 April 2023).

4. Department of Health. COVID-19 temporary MBS telehealth services - allied health providers, https://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/0C514FB8C9FBBEC7CA25852E00223AFE/$File/factsheet-COVID-19-Allied-Health-Post-1July2021.pdf (2021, accessed 28 April 2023).

5. Department of Health. COVID-19 temporary MBS telehealth services - GPs and other medical practitioners, https://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/0C514FB8C9FBBEC7CA25852E00223AFE/$File/Factsheet-COVID-19-GPsOMP-16.11.21.pdf (2021, accessed 28 April 2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3