A nosological review of depressive disorders based on observations in clinical practice, Part 1: terminology and phenomenology

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to describe the problems with the contemporary nosology of ‘depression’ and to discuss the key linguistic and phenomenological aspects that are essential prerequisites for a clinically meaningful typology of depressive disorders. The paper comprises observations and reflections drawn from clinical work. Conclusions: First, the use of the unqualified, stock term ‘depression’ is counterproductive, as are the diagnostic non-entities of ‘major depression’ and ‘dysthymia’. Second, the core psychopathology in melancholic depression is a loss of self-confidence, which helps explain the frequent co-occurrence of ‘anxiety’ with ‘depression’. Third, descriptive, non-technical terms such as ‘demoralisation’ and ‘grief’ are most helpful in formulating non-melancholic forms of depression and thus useful in differential diagnosis.